A Better Missile Defense for a Safer Europe - Robert M. Gates, New York Times opinion.
The future of missile defense in Europe is secure. This reality is contrary to what some critics have alleged about President Obama's proposed shift in America's missile-defense plans on the continent - and it is important to understand how and why.
First, to be clear, there is now no strategic missile defense in Europe. In December 2006, just days after becoming secretary of defense, I recommended to President George W. Bush that the United States place 10 ground-based interceptors in Poland and an advanced radar in the Czech Republic. This system was designed to identify and destroy up to about five long-range missiles potentially armed with nuclear warheads fired from the Middle East - the greatest and most likely danger being from Iran. At the time, it was the best plan based on the technology and threat assessment available.
That plan would have put the radar and interceptors in Central Europe by 2015 at the earliest. Delays in the Polish and Czech ratification process extended that schedule by at least two years. Which is to say, under the previous program, there would have been no missile-defense system able to protect against Iranian missiles until at least 2017 - and likely much later...
More at The New York Times.
Comments
A perfectly resonable decision that was bungled in the roll-out.
- It was announced on the same day as the 60th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland
- The cancellation was announced BEFORE the new plan was announced...RULE #1 in strat comm is "my idea is always the best one"...explain why the new plan is so good, and the public will explain why ditching the old plan is a good idea.
Who are these amatuers at the White House Press Office?