Berlin Wall Anniversary Sparks Look at History
Andre de Nesnera, Voice of America
November 9th marks the 25th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.
We spoke with British historian Frederick Taylor, an expert on the Berlin Wall and author of the Book “The Berlin Wall - A World Divided 1961-1989” about what prompted East German authorities to build the wall in the first place.
Under the terms of the 1945 Yalta Agreement, the victorious allies of World War Two divided Germany into four sectors, or zones of occupation: the American, British, French and Soviet zones.
About 160 kilometers inside the Soviet zone lay Germany’s capital Berlin. The city was also divided into four sectors along the same lines as Germany.
Tensions Between Soviets and Western Powers
As the post-war period went from months into years, tensions emerged between the Soviets and the three Western allies. In 1949, the Western zones of Germany split from the communist, Soviet-allied government in East Germany, the area that surrounded Berlin.
Historian Frederick Taylor said “Berlin, sitting inside the Soviet zone - a kind of Trojan horse, if you will, of capitalism as the Soviets and their German communist allies saw it - became this symbol of a Western way of life continuing to exist inside what was increasingly the frozen and repressive Cold War Soviet bloc.”
Taylor said a border was built between East and West Germany.
“By 1952, in fact, there was a fortified border where you could be shot for trying to cross it from East to West. But in Berlin, because of the peculiar status of the city as a military-controlled area, and it continued to be controlled by military law, even after the two German states were set up,” said Taylor.
“There were checkpoints and so on, but people could actually travel pretty easily between East and West Berlin. This meant that East Germans, who were tired of the kind of poor standard of living and the lack of freedom in the communist-ruled East Germany, which by 1951 in fact was poorer than it had been four, three years earlier, not richer could do so,” he said.
Exodus From East Germany
Taylor says between 1949 and 1961, East Germany - out of a population of 17 million - lost around two and a half million people to West Germany.
“In effect, what was obvious to the East German government and indeed, eventually, to their Soviet masters, by the end of the 1950s, as we go into 1960-61, was that their country was bleeding to death - bleeding its best and its brightest to the West,” he said. “So something had to be done about it. And the question was what.”
The historian said East German leaders had options.
“They could have offered reforms, they could have offered a more efficient and productive economy. They could have offered the kinds of political freedoms and freedom of movement that most educated and civilized people require,” he said. “But of course they didn’t. They were attached to the Stalinist model of a command economy, now found in very, very few places in the world, possibly only in North Korea and Cuba, really.”
Taylor said the East German leadership felt the only way to stop the exodus of East Germans to West Germany was to build a physical barrier. And they decided to do it between East and West Berlin.
Berlin Wall Erected
The historian said on the night of the 12th to the 13th of August 1961 tons of wood, cinder blocks and barbed wire were funneled into East Berlin.
“Basically what they did first was to run barbed wire around everything, block many cross-streets that went from East to West Berlin with concrete tank trap material and cinder blocks. There were guards every few yards watching the workers who were putting up these barriers, and basically they did the whole thing in less than 12 hours,” said Taylor.
“By Sunday morning, the morning of Sunday August the 13th, 1961, everybody woke up, East and West Berliners alike and found that essentially, a barrier had been built. It wasn’t yet a wall, it was a fence. A barbed wire fence with cinder blocks to block the streets and prevent vehicles getting through.”
Taylor said the barbed wire beginnings of the Berlin Wall divided overnight, with savage finality, neighborhoods, families and friends.
Families and Neighborhoods Divided
“Wherever you were on that night, you had to decide what to do. If you were a Westerner staying in the East, they’ll let you back, no question about that. If you were an Easterner staying in the West, say with relatives, which of course, it was a weekend, actually, a lot of people, several thousand in fact, were staying in the West and they had to decide what to do: to go back to their families or to stay in the West. Many, many of them decided to stay with considerable sacrifice. But also, simply there were neighborhoods - the new barrier ran literally down the middle of streets.”
The historian said it was about a week later that the first proper wall-like structure was constructed, south of the Brandenburg Gate. When fully built, the wall was about 43 kilometers long where it cut through the center of Berlin and more than 110 kilometers long as it divided West Berlin from East Germany. In addition, there were more than 300 watchtowers, as well as minefields, floodlights and guns that fired automatically.
Taylor described the feeling of many East Germans.
“It’s the great tragedy of this time. It was the dashed hopes, the disappointment, the claustrophobia, the ghastly feeling of this lack of freedom of movement, the freedom to breathe, the freedom to feel. I think that when I talked to people who lived through all that, that’s always the most striking thing. I think it’s very hard for us to understand,” said Taylor.
For the next several decades, East Germans tried to escape to freedom by using various methods, from climbing the wall to tunneling underneath it. Chances of making it were slim. But Taylor says people were willing to risk everything for the promise of a better life that lay just beyond the Berlin Wall.
Comments
I am not the only one who sees a direct connection between Putin's KGB days in Dresden and his claims thrown against the West---that is was Western and NATO "humiliations" that drove him to take the Crimea and now eastern Ukraine.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/09/how-the-fall-of-the-be…?
The "humiliation" was being the great conquerer of Hitler Nazism and then being told by the "Germans" to pack up and be gone by 1995. He has not forgotten that experience.
What he learned and saw in Dresden leading up to the Wall and his recall to Moscow convinced him of the term "people power" and when he saw it again raising itself in the Maidan---then he acted.
So again history does teach some people the wrongs things. Just look how he is rewriting history out of his perspective. In 2009 he condemns the Stalin/Ribbentrop secret agreements on the division of Poland and yesterday he cheers it on as being OK.
So Poland/Baltics perk up and play a heck of a lot of attention to what Putin is saying and doing. You know what your fate was in the 1939 agreements.
David---what is and was amazing by the fall of the Wall---88% of all GDR youth were in the FDJ and yet they were in the streets in Leipzig, Dresden, Alex, driving the protests forward, and at the same time many wore punk listened to Biermann and the Stones and partied harder than many West Berlin students.
The SED totally lost their youth generation by 1989.
This same type of youth movement never happened at all in the Soviet Union.
David---if you take at face value all the Putin complaints of "Russian humiliation" at the hands of NATO--I really do believe it goes back to the GDR population as a whole forcing via peaceful means and with virtually no violence something built in the early 60s and stated by Walter Ulbricht---it would last 100 years to fall.
If one that the face value that "Gorbi" was a liberal driving force and is the "father of the Wall---then why did he attempt to brutally put down Baltic aspirations in 90/91---those actions do not match his image here in Germany.
The "humiliation" that Putin speaks of is the simple fact---the Soviets and now Russians were in fact "kicked out" of a country they felt they had "conquered" and destroyed---so here was the "conquered" country basically stating now you must go home.
Putin was part of a Dresden KGB plan to recruit GDR citizens to take control after Honecker was thrown out which the KGB felt would happen so they went on a recruiting campaign and there is some indication that they recruited upwards of 60 "true believers" to replace Honecker if need be and to take over the GDR government reins. It was basically a KGB driven plan for a coup of the SED in an attempt to keep the GDR part and parcel of the Soviet Union.
The Stasi General--Mielke got wind of the KGB plot and had Putin and company called in and basically told to butt out---and he then had his Stasi shadow their movements to reinforce his comments---that was when Putin was then pulled out of Dresden and went back to the SU.
Two German federal states still have open investigations into that plot and have never been fully able to confirm who was recruited by Putin and company.
In some ways this was the first beginnings of the Arab Springs and the Color revolts in eastern Europe.
The success behind the Wall and which led to the fall was the single driving force called reunification ---that is the missing piece in all the follow on events up to the Maidan.
But we are seeing something similar in the Maidan---the creation of a truly nation state rallying around a common cause---the history of the Ukraine has been brutal both from the Communists under Stalin to the Nazi's under Hitler and the corrupted Russian favoring Ukrainian oligarchs since 1991.
This IMO is what Putin keeps referring to in his "humiliation" statements---a second Wall occurred in the Maidan and he is fearing the same course for Moscow at some point in the future and I think he is correct in that assumption.
Outlaw09,
I too recall the East German Border Guard commander giving an explanation to the superb 1994 BBC documentary 'Fall of the Wall'. Alas the documentary does not appear on YouTube.
Same man interviewed the other day by the Daily Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11213812/The-m…
Having visited West Berlin long ago and the Inner German Border a few years after 1994, it all came as quite a shock - that the division was so stark (cannot think of a better word).
It must have been fantastic to have been in Berlin when the wall came down.
While not wanting to rain on the "authors book"---she made two major mistakes which surprises me for someone who allegedly did extensive research on the topic.
1. She missed completely the major 4 November demonstration held in the center of Berlin in Alexander Platz that drew an estimated 300,000 and some say 500,000.
Totally peaceful and there were a long series of speakers that day on a hastily built platform on the back of a truck from high ranking SED members to the civil rights/peace movement to the GDR writer Stephan Hymn (also a former US citizen WW2 vet) --and one who is leading today the German "Die Linke" Party to the then super famous GDR Spy King himself---Markus Wolf.
Markus was said to have mentioned to a speaker going onto stage before him --"over there is plum cake and coffee take some before you speak"--the speaker knew at that point the Wall was coming down and it was just a matter of days.
Many of the speakers even though members of the SED openly critiqued the SED and demanded free travel etc.
That specific demo on top of those in Leipzig signaled the Wall coming down.
Why because the general GDR population not longer "feared" the ruling elites and realized the GDR had been built on lies.
There is a small story that highlights the extreme shortages that were the daily life in the GDR by 1989.
Three consumer items were in high demand the day of and the following days in West Berlin 1) jeans, 2) chocolate and 3) bananas ---WHAT was purchased the most? Bananas of all things!!!
2. The story concerning the LtCOL GDR Border Guard Commander on Brandenburger Tor is also wrong---greatly surprised by her story as I spoke to the same LtCOL a number of years ago concerning the several hours before he gave the command for his Border Guards to sling their AKs with the muzzles down. His greatest disappointment was that he was not accepted into the German military after the GDR Border Guard Command was dissolved.
The German TV last night also carried a film on the same officer and none of the authors comments were mentioned as well in that film.
3. Would have also liked to see the author mentioning the kicking out of the GDR the singer/poet and Communist Wolfgang Biermann in 1976 who I believe was the subtle trigger in starting the general population to question the SED and the entire Stasi system.
Biermann had a large following among the younger GDR generation as he was highly respected for "speaking truth to power" and his being kicked out of the GDR was stunning to them.
Would have been more interesting if the author had woven into the fall of the Wall Putin's KGB involvement in countering the "peace movement" from his Dresden KGB office.
Believe the fall of the Wall regardless of what many say is the "humiliation of the Soviets losing power" that Putin carries with him today.
Having fought all the way to Berlin/defeating Hitler in 1945, and then to be basically told to leave in 1994 was a shock to many KGB officers especially those of Putin's rank--LtCOL.
I liked this comment, "Overall, this is a story of complex interactions, unintended consequences and catastrophic success." The author went on to talk about outcomes not being preordained, which is true in most situations. It only seemed preordained in hindsight. Taleb discussed this hindsight bias in "The Black Swan."
I was in East Asia at the time, so following the events was a bit challenging, but needless to say it was major news around the world. I recall that emotionally, the tearing down of the Wall was on par with the 9/11 attacks. Obviously the emotions were on opposite ends of emotional spectrum. The 9/11 attacks resulted in deep sadness and anger, while the tearing down of the Wall resulted in a deep emotional response that is beyond words, but in simple terms the emotions reflected great happiness and hope. I don't recall it being a sense of victory at the time because there was still a high degree of uncertainty over what it all meant.
It would be interesting to put a piece of the Wall and a piece of the WTC in the same Museum side by side, and explain what each one represents. Ultimately the descriptions would converge, and they would both represent the human spirit dominating over tyranny. The German people reunited, and NYC recovered and continues to prosper.
History keeps unfolding, but despite the amount of bad things happening in the world today, the overall trend is still positive relative to the tense years during the Cold War. That positive trend in many ways started when the Wall came down. We clearly can't afford to put our guard down, and we need to take action against a more diverse range of threats, but we also need to keep things in perspective and not quit doing the things that have made the world safer and more prosperous due to a few aberrations. These aberrations don't mean we got it wrong, just that we need to put effort into eliminating these threats. Becoming isolationists, defunding the UN, etc. is not the right path.
Mark Stout, of JHU has a short article on WoTR reviewing a new book on the fall of the Berlin Wall, well worth a read: http://warontherocks.com/2014/11/the-fall-of-the-berlin-wall-it-was-an-…
We often read about the 'strategic corporal', how about this East German border guard commander: 'Even then, the Wall remained closed until the senior duty officer at an obscure checkpoint overheard his superiors insulting him over an open phone line. The officer’s patience was likely strained after 12 hours on post, the last few of them facing down an unruly and growing mob that wanted to cross into West Berlin. Moreover, he was expecting to receive the results of medical diagnostic tests for cancer the next day. The insult was the straw that broke the camel’s back, as the officer soon snapped and angrily decided to start letting people out'.