Small Wars Journal

Counterinsurgency: One Elder at a Time

Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:36am
Counterinsurgency: One Elder at a Time

by Jarrin Jackson

I visited a small, isolated Afghan village near the Pakistan border in early 2011. My mission was to gather information, identify concerns, and help in any way I could.

On this brisk morning, I walked up to a mosque and asked to speak with the most influential person in the village. Minutes passed and I began to think I had been ignored. Then I saw a feeble, white-bearded old man. His back was curved and he used a tree branch as a cane. He was slowly making his way toward me, every bump in the ground seeming to pose a new challenge for him.

We exchanged the customary Islamic greeting—salaam alekum followed by wa alekum asalaam—and found a place to sit. He offered me chai for which I politely thanked him but refused. Untreated water in Afghanistan does not sit well with my stomach.

For the past 10 months I had patrolled the area and met plenty of Afghans. I learned how to meet locals, gain their trust, and promote the Afghan Government's values. But this encounter was different.

The old man spoke before I did, which was unusual. He began by saying that he was about to die and that he suspected it would happen very soon. He did not fear death, but he did fear his death's impact on the village. He said that although he was the elder there, the village did not have a successor. His people would have no leader when he died, a fact no one but him seemed to care about.

The old man told of how villages without quality leaders routinely became prey to insurgents in the area. He said the strength of a village is its cohesion, and an elder ensures this cohesion through strong leadership. He described how insurgents intimidated his community with violence; how they had recently left to openly rot the corpses of three of his villagers they had killed as powerful reminders not to oppose the insurgency. Insurgents forced young men to plant roadside bombs against Coalition Forces. The violence caused frightened villagers to stash illegal weapons in their homes. Fear prevented honest communication between local Afghans and those trying to help them. A powerful combination of coercion, violence, and fear drove a wedge between the people and Coalition Forces.

Though he clearly assessed the problems and their significance, the elder spoke of no efforts he had ever made to help the situation. He offered me no suggestions. He admitted he did not know what to do and he felt helpless. Hopeless. And then he just sat there, looking at me, waiting for me to speak.

Some wonder why we are in Afghanistan. Establishing and legitimizing a functioning government so as to defeat the insurgency sounds a little abstract, as does the Counterinsurgency (COIN) strategy for achieving it.

Perhaps this article will provide some clarity.

I was a 25-year old lieutenant in the United States Army. I grew up in a one-stoplight town in Oklahoma. I studied military history in college, graduated from the Army's best leadership schools, and trained for a year in one of the Army's most decorated battalions before receiving combat experience. All of this helped prepare me for solving problems, but nothing quite crystallized my understanding of our purpose and strategy in Afghanistan like my experience with the old man.

He was an old man, an Afghan leader, looking at death, but deeply caring for his people after he was gone. And, most significantly from the standpoint of COIN, he wanted me to help. He wanted me to teach him how to help his people, through governance and otherwise. He believed I, merely a physical representative of the Coalition Forces, could and would help. Meaning he had some measure of trust and understanding of our presence there. Meaning COIN's outreach to him was having some success.

Of course, I was not qualified to advise the old man. I needed a lifetime's worth of wisdom for that. But since I was the only one there, and he was looking at me, it became my duty to respond.

One lesson drilled into Soldiers of the United States is to never quit. If we quit, we will more likely die and fail. And failure is never an option.

Without the option to quit, the effort to succeed becomes a matter of analysis, creativity, and determination. As part of COIN, my mission was to problem-solve. That the old man's problem was awkward for me was no excuse. I am U.S. Soldier. I had to find a way to succeed.

As I saw it on that day, the main concern was not what to do with power and authority, but how to use power and authority to establish effective governance of a remote Afghan village, with a near-death elder and with ever-threatening insurgent violence. I knew I did not know the perfect answer, and the task's truncated timeline prevented me from soliciting outside help. The Afghan Soldiers with me also admitted to not knowing how to help him. My solution, therefore, came from my experience in Sabari: I asked another Afghan elder, who I knew through my several months of patrolling the area, to help solve the problem. This other elder lived in a different village 600 meters to the north. We were good friends and had a great relationship. Moreover, the old man knew the other elder very well. According to the old man, they were very good friends, but they had not seen each other in over 30 years. He explained that a combination of constant war, physical illness, and in this case, a deeply rooted feeling of isolation from the surrounding community, prevented them from speaking. I asked the old man if he respected the other elder—he did. I then described how prosperous the other elder's village was and how the other village interacted with other villages in Sabari District. The old man's eyes opened in amazement and it occurred to me that he never had the thought of asking for help from another Afghan, even if the other Afghan was a long-time friend that lived six and half football fields away!

The next step in solving the old man's dilemma was to convince him to model the success of the other village. In order to do that, the old man had to re-establish communication with the other elder, because my actions as a mouthpiece between the two men would be inefficient. I did not have the same stake as the two old men; my personal stake was high, but not as high as the old man's. He understood that personally communicating with the other elder would be more effective than using me as a conduit. Moreover, the other elder's advice superseded my own because the other elder shared similar values and had significant experience in successfully governing a prosperous Afghan village. I reasoned that the shared value system, religious belief, and knowledge of the area gave the two men critical experience that I lacked which meant my involvement only exacerbated the difficulty of the solution process.

I ended the conversation by proposing other ideas that supported the individual-driven solution process. I outlined tangible steps for the old man to take. First, I told him to start having shuras. Similar to a town hall meeting, shuras created a forum for the old man to voice his concerns. He had a cultural mandate to gather his community. I suggested he make it a weekly event. Secondly, he needed to use the shura to choose his successor. He was supposed to make it a public concern, ask for input, and make a decision. Lastly, I emphasized the importance of seeking advice from the other elder. Both men had incentives to solve the old man's dilemma. The greater community benefited from the cooperation of the two men.

The same type of insurgents that attacked the United States on 9/11 use violence to control the Afghan population today. The old man in this story grew up with war, but it was not his fault. He never had a strong benefactor to guarantee his personal liberties. He never had the opportunity to learn how to govern his community. My service in Afghanistan was necessary to defeat the insurgents. The United States' war in Afghanistan is not a misadventure that squanders treasure and needlessly sheds American blood. It is a war to quarantine extremist violence and protect the defenseless people in Afghanistan.

The old man's question took time to ask. I patrolled Sabari for ten months before the old man felt comfortable enough to trust me. He risked his life by asking me for help, which demonstrated his concern for his community over his personal well-being. American efforts are not in vain. It takes time for Counterinsurgency's gains to come to fruition. Afghans care about their peace and security. They want what is best for their children. The fulcrum for American involvement is to shape an environment that precipitates Afghan initiative.

I witnessed a dramatic improvement to security in Sabari. Villagers grew accustomed to my professionalism. They understood my intentions were to help them and improve their community. More importantly, they understood that their community improved more when they cooperated with me, which lead to situations similar to the one with the old man. I am not responsible for the improved security in Sabari. I did not solve the war in Afghanistan. I did my job. American Soldiers use the same amount of effort and creativity to produce similar results. Soldiers receive incredible training that offsets their lack of academic qualifications by giving them invaluable problem-solving skills. Their efforts are focused. They create favorable conditions conducive for Afghans to take the personal initiative to ensure their own well-being. The pieces are set, and the population is beginning to make a move.

I left Afghanistan three weeks after my conversation with the old man. I do not know if my solution helped him. After I left the old man's village, I informed the other elder of my conversation with his estranged friend—he understood. As I left the other elder's village, I noticed a slow moving figure approaching—he used a tree branch as a cane. It took thirty years to walk the length of six football fields, but the old man was there to talk.

1LT Jarrin Jackson graduated from the United States Military Academy in 2008. He served as an Infantry Platoon Leader in Khost Province in support of OEF 10-11. He will attend the Maneuver Captain's Career Course at Ft. Benning in July 2011.

Comments

gypsysnipe

Sat, 06/25/2011 - 4:52pm

This country is unfixable. Karzai is hated outside his tribe, and is robbing us blind. Counter-terror is the way to go, we will have to maintain some kinds of bases there. The real problem is Pakistan, who has been caught red handed with OBL. Those same jihadists have polluted the Pak military. State sponsor of terror. We should be building ties with India to use as leverage against the Paki's.

Bob's World

Sat, 06/25/2011 - 2:00pm

I don't know about anyone else, but my "spidey-sense" goes off when two elders 600M apart "are good friends" who have not spoken in 30 years.

We will never have the understanding necessary to be able to "fix" local governance in such a situation. We just don't know the family, tribal histories that are woven into the fabric, and well-intended disasters often occur.

In Uruzgan Province Juma Gul was hailed as a great police Chief by the Dutch for being a very aggressive eradicator of poppy. Small point that he only eradicated the poppy of a rival tribe, while increasing the market share for his own. I suspect the others refused to make the payment he demanded so that he could send his payment in turn to his patrons up in Kabul. Same guy also mysteriously "lost" some 600 new AKs out of his arms room.

Or in Kandahar where we routinely turn to MG Shirzai, who conveniently lives a couple hundred yard from the front gate of KAF for help with development and security matters. No problem, service with a smile. He is reportedly worth hundreds of Millions of dollars, though is a pauper compred to Gul Agah Shirzai. Enriched on Coaltion dollars and a patron that directs development and jobs to thier friends and families. Where do Taliban come from? Perhaps those who are excluded from legal economic or political opportunity by this same system.

When it comes to understanding this culture enough to "fix" anything we are like a monkey with a hammer and a wrench trying to fix a fine watch. Well intended acts of goodness can make an insurgency worse just as effectively as intentional acts of careless or intentional violence.

Besides, the beating heart of the insurgency is in the Karzai government and his constitution, yet that is what we dedicate our efforts to protect. There are lessons in the Lieutenants tale, but unless one understands insurgency first, one will surely not draw the right lessons to help them with COIN.

Frustrating.

Bob

Joe (not verified)

Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:54am

I did some googling, and found an article in Stars and Stripes from early summer of 2010 called, "Volatile Afghan District Has Soldiers on Edge." It described the almost constant combat that Delta Company was having to endure early in their tour in Sabari District. More googling revealed that this was indeed the company Lt. Jackson was in. If it is true that he witnessed a dramatic improvement in security in Sabari District then just maybe this incident he described, admittedly just a brick in the edifice, is some evidence that PETRAEUS, ONCE AGAIN, IS ON TO SOMETHING, and that just maybe we need to see this surge through, and maybe then the Afghans can emulate their Iraqi cousins and take control of their own country.

Anymouse (not verified)

Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:08pm

LT, ditto Peter Munson, keep on keeping on. We all will be the better for it.

pjmunson

Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:59pm

Perhaps this is an Army cultural thing, but to an outsider (Marine) it seems like you guys are throwing around the "LT" address like a pejorative. How about 1LT Jackson or Jarrin (as a lot of us are roaming around this board by first name (Gian, for example) without varying levels of rank attached. We don't want the LT LT LT to stop putting his opinion out there.

1LT Jackson, good first article (I assume). Don't take the criticisms personally unless you find them to be true, then use them to hone your outlook and skills. Or fire back.

Joe (not verified)

Fri, 06/24/2011 - 8:32pm

Ryan et al,

Khost Province is where this infantrymen toiled for 12 months. Khost abuts North Waziristan, Pakistan. Khost is where Pat Tillman was killed. Look at a map of casualties and you'll see it's been a white hot area. If this lawless tribal cesspool of Taliban and Haqanni Network insurgents can be pacified by whatever means then we are doing something right. You must learn to walk before you can run. Perhaps there are areas of Afghanistan where it is possible to involve the bureaucrats, but Khost is not yet one of those areas. I thank God there are men like this guy and his platoon who use their brains as well as their firepower. And, by the way, to the commenter who says these soldiers are not hunting down the enemy, THAT IS HOW YOU HUNT DOWN THE ENEMY. YOU GO TO THE VILLAGES WHERE THEY ARE at least half the time. They don't stay in the mountains. They are either in the villages or the villagers know who they are or where they can be found. We are not fighting this the Soviet Way. We are fighting it in the most effective way that we know how, and I suspect this lt. knows more about what is effective than we do.

ryan (not verified)

Fri, 06/24/2011 - 2:37am

additionally:

COIN is not about the people coming to you for help:
"And, most significantly from the standpoint of COIN, he wanted me to help. He wanted me to teach him how to help his people, through governance and otherwise"

COIN is about what you can do to connect the Government to the people.

We are not in Phase I of the COIN campaign.

ryan (not verified)

Fri, 06/24/2011 - 2:27am

LT,

I commend you for putting your thoughts on paper and providing your experiences for others to study. We need to be careful of our liberal use of the word "COIN".

But I agree with John. This was a quicky-feely win, but there must be more done for this to be a significant lasting impact at the National and Local levels, and for this to be studied as a success story for COIN doctrine.

Where was GIRoA?? Why didnt the District Government get involved with our DoS and USAID? Chief of Police? Even Provincial Government? Community Based Security Program? New AUP checkpoints near the town to thwart growing security concerns?

That is COIN: Place the Host Nation Government in a position in which it can demonstrate its ability to Govern and succeed to the Afghan people. This is even more significant when we are talking about getting GIRoA involved with Tribal affairs.

COIN is NOT simply meeting with locals to solve problems.

COIN is a term that plagues our Army leadership at all levels and we are not educating our junior leaders properly.

John (not verified)

Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:50pm

Well LT here is the problem. Your thinking COIN. I am sure you got a warm feeling from giving the village elder advice. I don't blame you I blame the leaders who trained you. You must look at the bigger picture which is the Afghans either A. Fix it themselves, and what do we gain out of that or B. They don't and what can we do to get something out of it. In what way did you influence the stratigic fight? The answer is none. At what level did you do anything useful? Maybe the tactical, for a minute. What if after you left the villige was purged by the insurgenants? Nothing long term was gained. Not much if anything short term was either. You helped a guy out. Nice story but wars are not won with nice stories. The time you spent being a bartender to this guy would have been better spent looking for the enemy and distroying him. That village is no better off for the time you spent. Which is to bad because I believe you did the best you could. But until we get with the program, hunt them down in there holes and make the insurgents fear us, like the plague, we will not accomplish much

Ken White (not verified)

Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:49pm

This quote from the article says it all...<blockquote>"I left Afghanistan three weeks after my conversation with the old man. I do not know if my solution helped him."</blockquote>Have to agree with <b>Jed</b>, "<i>It has little to no bearing on the security of the United States.</i>"

We've lost sight of the forest...

Jed (not verified)

Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:52am

An interesting and well written bit of prose, but this LT's experience has no more to do with successfully supporting US vital national interests than the accounts of a missionary.

Good works, but so what? He was well liked, well respected, and undeniably solved problems...great, but that's not what we, as a military, should be doing. It has little to no bearing on the security of the United States.

COIN acolytes continue to be indoctrinated and have full faith that, by following the 3-24 script(ure), they will save Afghanistan from itself. Hope is critical for religion, but it shouldn't be the basis of our fighting force efforts.