We know there are problems with commenting in this post, so please weigh in at the original disruptive thinking post until we get this one fixed.
Everyone's favorite cubicle-dweller, Doctrine Man, weighed in at his blog on yesterday's blockbuster article from Ben Kohlmann.
So, as we approach this crossroads, this historical inflection point, we have two choices: one, embrace the disruptive thinkers; or two, push them aside and weather the storm with the “yes men” who seem so content to genuflect at the altar of the status quo. You see, real change is top-driven, but fueled from below. Separating those two layers is a filter that, more often than not, ultimately shapes the course and speed of change. That filtering layer – where you will generally find seasoned O-5s and O-6s – is where ideas either flourish, or are lured into a cul-de-sac and slowly strangled to death. It really is that simple.
Choose your filter, but choose wisely. Who we surround ourselves with during this time is at least as important as who we choose to exclude. If we are to achieve the type of institutional change necessary to transform for the future, we must embrace the disruptive thinkers. We must open our minds to them and allow them to breathe free. This isn’t heresy, it is an absolutism. Or twenty years from now, people who look a lot like us will glance around and utter those fateful words: “I never saw that coming.”
Comments
Quoth Doctrine Man:<blockquote>"Who we surround ourselves with during this time is at least as important as who we choose to exclude. If we are to achieve the type of institutional change necessary to transform for the future, we must embrace the disruptive thinkers."</blockquote>Truer words were rarely spake.
Who we surround ourselves with is largely a function of a very poorly performing and self interested Personnel 'system' effectively dating from 1917 with only minor tweaks since...
No thinking allowed until that is fixed.