Small Wars Journal

India shows the U.S. how to inspect a ship

Wed, 08/12/2009 - 12:01pm
In the past two months, the United States and India have had encounters with North Korean cargo ships suspected of transporting missile or WMD components banned by UN Security Council resolutions. In one of these encounters, the suspect North Korean vessel was allowed to wander through the ocean for weeks until it reversed course and returned home. In the second case, a coast guard ship chased and seized the North Korean vessel and brought it into port, whereupon the crew was detained for interrogation and the vessel thoroughly inspected.

In June, New York Times reporter David Sanger captured the White House staff's Hamlet-like mood of self-doubt and auto-generated second-guessing as it pondered what to do about North Korea's Kang Nam, then shadowed by USS John S. McCain:

"The whole thing just doesn't add up," said one senior administration official who has been tracking the cargo ship's lazy summer journey. "My worry is that we make a big demand about seeing the cargo, and then there's a tense standoff, and when it's all over we discover that old man Kim set us up to look like George Bush searching for nonexistent W.M.D."

No such worries for the Indian government which seized, boarded, brought into port, and inspected MV San. India's inspection revealed 16,000 tons of sugar but no missile parts, nuclear reactor components, or any other prohibited materials. Indian officials seem neither apologetic nor red-faced about this result.

Naturally there are some differences between the Kang Nam and MV San episodes. For reasons unknown, MV San dropped anchor in the middle of the night near Hut Bay Island, Indian territory. The Indian coast guard then gave chase and seized the ship. Perhaps if Kang Nam had anchored off Guam, the U.S. Navy would have subsequently seized it after it had chased it back out to sea. Or perhaps not. The June 2009 UN Security Council resolution required that North Korean crews first give their permission to high-seas boardings. U.S. officials deemed this a reason for not ordering USS John S. McCain to board Kang Nam. But it is not clear from the news reports that India received permission to board MV San. To the contrary, that crew was described as "uncooperative."

If the Proliferation Security Initiative and UNSCR 1874 are to ever have any meaning, some day there will have to be forced boardings of North Korean cargo ships. With a duplicate of North Korea's Yongbyon plutonium reactor having appeared in a Syrian desert, North Korea hardly merits the benefit of the doubt. If it is too shy to carry out this sort of work, perhaps the U.S. government should subcontract these duties to the Indian Coast Guard.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

Fri, 08/14/2009 - 2:29pm

Huge difference in the circumstance described. We did the right thing under the circumstances. If they had been in US waters, we certainly would have boarded them too.

homeslice

Fri, 04/20/2012 - 12:31am

In reply to by davidbfpo

Andaman Islands supposed to have major Indian Navy presence - major base for power projection into Indian Ocean

davidbfpo

Wed, 08/12/2009 - 4:05pm

The article says the North Korean ship was inside Indian territorial waters, so became "fair game" for an inspection.

Secondly, for reasons I am not aware of India is particularly sensitive over these islands and very few outsiders ever get in.