Small Wars Journal

Afghanistan to Cost More Than Marshall Plan, Watchdog Says and SIGAR Report Link

Wed, 07/30/2014 - 8:13pm

Afghanistan to Cost More Than Marshall Plan, Watchdog Says by Josh Smith, Stars and Stripes

By the time its combat troops depart at the end of 2014, the United States will have appropriated more money trying to fix Afghanistan than it did on the Marshall Plan that helped Europe recover economically after World War II, according to an analysis by a government watchdog.

The comparison in the latest quarterly report of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction draws attention to the mixed results of U.S. investments in Afghanistan — $104 billion appropriated since 2002 — versus the success of the Marshall Plan, which is credited with helping to spur the economic revival of Western Europe…

Read on.

Via the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction:

Today, SIGAR released its July 2014 Quarterly Report to Congress.

The report highlights, among many things:

--Total appropriations for Afghanistan reconstruction are about $104.1 billion, with $5.8 billion requested for 2015. About $16 billion, of the money already appropriated, has yet to be spent. (page 70)

--The sustainability of the reconstruction effort, and the key issue of Afghan governments revenues compared to the cost of the government.  The U.S. and donors fund more than 60% of the Afghan national budget. (page 3)

--Less than 20% of Afghanistan is expected to be accessible to civilian U.S. oversight personnel by December 2014, a 50% decrease since 2009. (page 19)

--The 30 reports issued this quarter examined programs & projects worth about $18.2 billion.  Most uncovered poor planning, shoddy construction, mechanical failures, and inadequate oversight. (page ii)

--The Army's refusal to suspend or debar supporters of the insurgency from receiving government contracts. (page iii)

--U.S. has spent $7.6 billion on counternarcotics efforts. The UN notes that for the third consecutive year, Afghanistan, saw an increase in opium cultivation. According to DOD, the drawdown has hurt the Afghan counternarcotics agencies. (page 112)

--Transition of Afghan Public Protection Force responsibilities leaves project security uncertain. (page 90)

--Women in the Afghan security forces. (page 105 & 110)

--SIGAR concerns with Afghanistan education statistics. (page 181)

--SIGAR concerns with Afghanistan health statistics. (page 183)

Report: http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/2014-07-30qr.pdf

Report by Section: http://www.sigar.mil/quarterlyreports/index.aspx?SSR=6

Comments

Madhu (not verified)

Thu, 07/31/2014 - 11:47am

Whoa, can that be possible?

Well, since the seeming purpose of the Washington Foreign Policy establishment from the DoD to State and various think tanks and associated PhD programs is to expand its own power and budgets and even private profiteering - Mission Accomplished!

Does this happen to everyone that is a long time Foreign Policy watcher?

1. Interest.
2. Fascination.
3. Uh, something is not right here.
4. Hey, wait a minute, why is everyone selling me a line? Why does no one tell the truth?
5. I bothered to actually ask a good question and I am now cut off from the people I used to email with all the time! Kiss up, kick down! Basic human decency and morality is negotiable!
6. Aw, go (*&^%(*& yourselves....

What is the next step? Developing a sense of humor and good grace about it? Realizing people are flawed and many analysts you've followed have no interest in being honest or are simply nutty ideologues? Or maybe not so bright?

So, when does this developing grace happen? I am still waiting.

Honesty is above rubies, above diamonds, above gold, above platinum....what a loser I am to think such silly thoughts!

When Foreign Policy types ask for civility, what they really mean is: shut up fool, and get with the program!