Taliban Casts Doubt on Peace Talks With Afghan Government
Ayaz Gul, Voice of America
Afghanistan's Taliban has cast further doubt on prospects for peace talks with the Kabul government.
In a Pashto language statement given to VOA Saturday, the Taliban said its leadership has not yet decided to engage in peace talks with the Kabul government because it believes no such effort will be productive until all foreign forces leave the country, sanctions on insurgent leaders are removed and Taliban prisoners are released.
The statement said U.S. night raids in Afghanistan are still continuing. It added that fresh American forces have deployed to the battlefield and that Afghan forces have also intensified their operations. It said in the light of these developments any peace talks will be meaningless.
Dampened Hopes
The Taliban statement has effectively dampened hopes for the peace talks to start any time soon.
Afghanistan's ambassador to Pakistan, Hazrat Omer Zakhilwal, expressed optimism Friday that peace talks would start within days, telling VOA that "there is a lot happening in the background" to get the talks under way. He said the planned starting date of the first week in March was "indicative" that plans are moving forward.
But a Pakistani security official with knowledge of efforts Islamabad is making to persuade the Taliban's Qatar-based political office to send someone, said “no headway has been achieved so far.”
The official, requesting anonymity, told VOA the talks are “not happening this week because no one from their [Taliban] side has yet agreed" to come to Islamabad.
The four-way talks are expected to involve diplomats from Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and the United States, as well as Taliban representatives.
US Support for Peace Process
In a video conference with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani Friday, President Barack Obama stressed U.S. support for a peace process that he says "reduces violence and ensures lasting stability in Afghanistan and the region."
White House officials said both presidents intend to use the July NATO summit in Warsaw to reaffirm international support for peace in Afghanistan.
Obama also congratulated Ghani for the progress he has made, including record government revenues and efforts to fight corruption, and praised the bravery and sacrifices of Afghan security forces.
Obama announced late last year he is postponing the withdrawal of most U.S. forces in Afghanistan one year until he leaves office in January 2017.
U.S. troops are training Afghan forces in taking full responsibility for providing their own security against the Taliban and other militants.
Comments
I once had a file where I kept public statements by various academics and public officials who said, "we must negotiate" with the Taliban without specifying what that really meant.
I practically had a whole file on Vali Nasr. The military has gone through much soul-searching (okay, certain non-politicized parts of it) but where is the same soul searching from those pundits? They have gone on to other things, type type typing away, full of solutions for complex problems they never have to actually dirty their hands with in reality.
Anyway, Small Wars and Insurgencies has the following articles:
Panjwai: a tale of two COINs in Afghanistan
and
After ISAF: partners and proxies in Afghanistan after 2014
Why do military journals in general seem to ignore academic literature?
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09592318.2016.1122901