Small Wars Journal

Blog Posts

SWJ Blog is a multi-author blog publishing news and commentary on the various goings on across the broad community of practice.  We gladly accept guest posts from serious voices in the community.

by SWJ Editors | Tue, 07/03/2007 - 10:14am | 2 comments

This piece of pseudo-history below bounces around the internet every year about this time. Like most things of its ilk, it probably has a few errors, and its author is writing to reinforce a point with succinct and selective facts. But darn if it doesn't strike a nerve.

As we in the U.S. chill our lite beer (ughh!) and refill the propane tanks to burn plenty of meat for the 4th, let's not forget the stories and sacrifices of the many proud Iraqis and Afghanis who are out there trying to do the right thing, whether it be for their country or just for their family. Their history, when it is finally written, looks like it will be on par with this list, at least in terms of blood. Unfortunately, the outcome is still very much in question. ....

by SWJ Editors | Mon, 07/02/2007 - 5:04am | 1 comment
Some initial reactions, commentary and links concerning Dave Kilcullen's SWJ post Understanding Current Operations in Iraq:

William Kristol at The Weekly Standard - Richard Lugar, Meet David Kilcullen

... Contrast Lugar's speech with an assessment of the situation in Iraq posted the very next day on the Small Wars Journal website. David Kilcullen, a former Australian military officer, is one of the world's leading experts on counterinsurgency warfare. A sharp critic of the previous U.S. strategy in Iraq, he was asked by General Petraeus to serve as an adviser during the development and early execution of the new strategy. Now finishing up his tour of duty, Kilcullen offered "personal views" of "what's happening, right now." It's worth reproducing much of Kilcullen's report, "Understanding Current Operations in Iraq"...

Max Boot at Commentary's Contentions -- Kilcullen's War

Readers of contentions interested in learning more about current military operations in Iraq than what they get from the headlines (which invariably focus on casualties, not on why or how they were incurred) would be well advised to read two Internet postings. The first is a report by Kimberly Kagan, an independent military historian and analyst, on the website of her think tank, the Institute for the Study of War. The second is a blog post written by David Kilcullen, a former officer in the Australian army with a Ph.D. in anthropology who has been serving as General David Petraeus's chief counterinsurgency adviser. Kilcullen's item is especially interesting because for the past few months he has had an insider's perspective on the operations conducted and planned by U.S. forces in Iraq; in fact, he has been helping to shape the very operations that he explains here...

More...

by Jim Guirard | Fri, 06/29/2007 - 3:54am | 5 comments
In his multi-faceted article, "New Paradigms For 21st Century Conflict," David Kilcullen of General David Petraeus' senior staff in Baghdad recommends five major initiatives to be taken in developing truly effective counterterrorism (COIN) strategies, operations and tactics against al Qaeda-style Terrorism (AQST).

In briefest of terms, these are to (1) Develop a New Lexicon, (2) Get the Grand Strategy Right, (3) Remedy the Imbalance in Government Capability, (4) Identify New Strategic Services, and (5) Develop Capacity For Strategic Information Warfare. While others will comment in learned fashion on all five of these topics in due course, this commentary will concern only the first -- the proposed New Lexicon...

by John A. Nagl | Wed, 06/27/2007 - 8:35pm | 3 comments
Although there were lonely voices arguing that the Army needed to focus on counterinsurgency in the wake of the Cold War—Dan Bolger, Eliot Cohen, and Steve Metz chief among them—the sad fact is that when an insurgency began in Iraq in the late summer of 2003, the Army was unprepared to fight it. The American Army of 2003 was organized, designed, trained, and equipped to defeat another conventional army; indeed, it had no peer in that arena. It was, however, unprepared for an enemy who understood that it could not hope to defeat the U.S. Army on a conventional battlefield, and who therefore chose to wage war against America from the shadows.

The story of how the Army found itself less than ready to fight an insurgency goes back to the Army's unwillingness to internalize and build upon the lessons of Vietnam. Chief of Staff of the Army General Peter Schoomaker has written that in Vietnam, "The U.S. Army, predisposed to fight a conventional enemy that fought using conventional tactics, overpowered innovative ideas from within the Army and from outside it. As a result, the U.S. Army was not as effective at learning as it should have been, and its failures in Vietnam had grave implications for both the Army and the nation." Former Vice Chief of Staff of the Army General Jack Keane concurs, recently noting that in Iraq, "We put an Army on the battlefield that I had been a part of for 37 years. It doesn't have any doctrine, nor was it educated and trained, to deal with an insurgency . . . After the Vietnam War, we purged ourselves of everything that had to do with irregular warfare or insurgency, because it had to do with how we lost that war. In hindsight, that was a bad decision."...

by Dave Kilcullen | Tue, 06/26/2007 - 8:11am | 46 comments
I've spent much of the last six weeks out on the ground, working with Iraqi and U.S. combat units, civilian reconstruction teams, Iraqi administrators and tribal and community leaders. I've been away from e-mail a lot, so unable to post here at SWJ: but I'd like to make up for that now by providing colleagues with a basic understanding of what's happening, right now, in Iraq.

This post is not about whether current ops are "working" — for us, here on the ground, time will tell, though some observers elsewhere seem to have already made up their minds (on the basis of what evidence, I'm not really sure). But for professional counterinsurgency operators such as our SWJ community, the thing to understand at this point is the intention and concept behind current ops in Iraq: if you grasp this, you can tell for yourself how the operations are going, without relying on armchair pundits. So in the interests of self-education (and cutting out the commentariat middlemen—sorry, guys) here is a field perspective on current operations...

by SWJ Editors | Sun, 06/24/2007 - 7:27pm | 0 comments
Received from Council member Lieutenant Colonel Mark O'Neill -- LtCol O'Neill is the Army Fellow at the Lowy Institute for International Policy. He has been seconded to the Lowy Institute from the Australian Army.

Joining the Caravan? The Middle East, Islamism and Indonesia

By Anthony Bubalo and Dr Greg Fealy

Lowy Institute Paper #5:

Since 9/11 a number of claims have been made about the global nature of the threat posed by militant Islam, many of these have been debated extensively at the Small Wars Journal. This significant monograph from a part of the world directly engaged in these issues provides a fresh, research driven and policy focused perspective on this topical issue. From the paper's executive summary...

by Dave Dilegge | Sun, 06/24/2007 - 5:16pm | 3 comments

Men of Harlech stop your dreaming

Can't you see their spear points gleaming

See their warrior pennants streaming

To this battlefield

Men of Harlech stand ye steady

It cannot be ever said ye

For the battle were not ready

Welshmen never yield

From the hills rebounding

Let this song be sounding

Summon all at Cambria's call

The mighty force surrounding

Men of Harlech on to glory

This will ever be your story

Keep these burning words before ye

Welshmen will not yield

Hat Tip to Council Member 120mm

by Frank Hoffman | Sun, 06/24/2007 - 7:06am | 2 comments
I wanted to alert the SWJ community regarding my recently issued essay on modern counterinsurgency in the Summer issue of Parameters. This essay, titled "Neo-Classical Counter-insurgency?" strives to accomplish two objectives; a) an evaluation of the newly issued Army/Marine counterinsurgency manual and b) arguments for extending our understanding of classical (largely Maoist) insurgents into the 21st century. I think I was more successful about the former than the latter objective and I will await the SWJ's collective assessment. This essay extends and builds upon my 2005 essay in the Journal of Strategic Studies, "Small Wars Revisited." I am pretty satisfied with the COIN manual and believe it deserves the acclaim it has received to date. I think it's a product of various schools of thought about modern insurgencies, although still too grounded in what I called the Classical School, based on the concepts of Mao and Revolutionary Warfare...
by SWJ Editors | Sat, 06/23/2007 - 6:21pm | 0 comments
NO TRUE GLORY: A FRONTLINE ACCOUNT OF THE BATTLE FOR FALLUJAH. Bing West. Bantam Books, 2005, 380 pp., $25.00.

SWJ Book Review by Terry Daly

Bing West's superb book on the loss and retaking of Fallujah in al-Anbar Province, western Iraq, in 2004 excels on several levels. For the general reader it tells a heroic story in the tradition of American combat writing of Richard Tregaskis on Guadalcanal, Robert Sherrod on Tarawa, and Samuel Lyman Atwood ("SLAM") Marshal on World War II, Korea and Vietnam. Second, its dependence on first hand knowledge from participants at every level among U.S. military and civilian participants, while the action was taking place, guarantees it will be one of the basic historical reference works for future writers on the Iraq war...

by Dave Kilcullen | Sat, 06/23/2007 - 7:16am | 13 comments
I asked the SWJ to pass along that I've been continuously in the field of late and haven't posted to the blog as much as I would have liked to. I am still very much engaged in the Small Wars Journal community and will be posting here again soon. In the meantime I offer up this article published in the June 2007 issue of the Department of State's eJournal. I might add that there are some excellent articles in this issue of eJournal -- well worth following the link and taking a look around...
by SWJ Editors | Thu, 06/21/2007 - 9:49pm | 0 comments
PBS FRONTLINE Introduction to Endgame:

On Dec. 19, 2006, President George W. Bush said for the first time that the United States is not winning the war in Iraq. It was a dramatic admission from a president who had insisted since the start of the war that things were under control.

Now, as the U.S. begins what the administration hopes is the final effort to secure victory through a "surge" of troops, Gen. Jack Keane (Ret.), Col. William Hix, Col. H.R. McMaster, Maj. Thomas Mowle, State Department Counselor Philip Zelikow and other military and government officials talk to FRONTLINE about both the military and political events that have led up to the current "surge" strategy. Endgame is the fifth film in a series of Iraq war stories from FRONTLINE producer Michael Kirk, including Rumsfeld's War, The Torture Question, The Dark Side and The Lost Year in Iraq...
by SWJ Editors | Thu, 06/21/2007 - 7:47pm | 1 comment
The following is a summary of an article that will appear in Volume 9 of the Small Wars Journal online magazine to be published in July. Dan Green works at the U.S. Department of State in the Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism. He served a year as a political advisor to the Tarin Kowt provincial reconstruction team in Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan, for which he received the DOS's Superior Honor Award and the U.S. Army's Superior Civilian Service Award. He also received a letter of commendation from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Peter Pace. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bush administration or the DOS. Mr. Green is currently mobilized by the Navy and will be serving in Iraq as a tribal liaison officer. His latest article, Counterinsurgency Diplomacy: Political Advisors at the Operational and Tactical Levels was published in the May -- June 2007 issue of Military Review...
by SWJ Editors | Mon, 06/18/2007 - 9:17pm | 2 comments
We introduce two articles by Don Vandergriff (Raising the Bar: Creating and Nurturing Adaptability to Deal with the Changing Face of War) on the importance of adaptability in our military leaders with an excerpt from Chapter 5 (page 5-31) of the Army and Marine Corps Counterinsurgency (COIN) Manual.

Learning and Adapting

When an operation is executed, commanders may develop the situation to gain a more thorough situational understanding. This increased environmental understanding represents a form of operational learning and applies across all Logical Lines of Operations. Commanders and staffs adjust the operation's design and plan based on what they learn. The result is an ongoing design-learn-redesign cycle.

COIN operations involve complex, changing relations among all the direct and peripheral participants. These participants adapt and respond to each other throughout an operation. A cycle of adaptation usually develops between insurgents and counterinsurgents; both sides continually adapt to neutralize existing adversary advantages and develop new (usually short-lived) advantages of their own. Victory is gained through a tempo or rhythm of adaptation that is beyond the other side's ability to achieve or sustain. Therefore, counterinsurgents should seek to gain and sustain advantages over insurgents by emphasizing the learning and adaptation that this manual stresses throughout.

Learning and adapting in COIN is very difficult due to the complexity of the problems commanders must solve. Generally, there is not a single adversary that can be singularly classified as the enemy. Many insurgencies include multiple competing groups. Success requires the HN government and counterinsurgents to adapt based on understanding this very intricate environment. But the key to effective COIN design and execution remains the ability to adjust better and faster than the insurgents.

Both of the following linked articles by Major Don Vandergriff (USA, Ret.) address US Army training, education and culture and its relative importance in producing the adaptive leaders we require. Vandergriff retired August 30, 2005 following 24 years of active duty as a Marine enlisted and Army officer. He has served in numerous troop, staff and education assignments in the United States and overseas. Vandergriff is a recognized authority on the U.S. Army personnel system, Army culture, leadership development, soldier training and the emergence in the early 21st century of asymmetric warfare...

by SWJ Editors | Fri, 06/15/2007 - 2:15pm | 3 comments
BREAKING NEWS...Counterinsurgency Guidance that Headquarters, Multi-National Corps -- Iraq will be releasing later today. It is signed by Lieutenant General Ray Odierno. The prior link is the two-fer Arabic & English version. Here's Arabic only and English only.

Ten Key Points:....

by Bing West | Fri, 06/15/2007 - 12:32pm | 1 comment
SWJ Editors Note - the following excerpt is from an article by Bing West and Owen West and was originally posted at the New York Times.

The Laptop Is Mightier Than the Sword

By Owen West and Bing West

While waiting to see if the Iraq surge strategy pays off, President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have shown Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the door and brought in Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute as the new White House "war czar." Well, they can shift senior leadership all they want, but unless they give our troops patrolling the streets the tools they need, our leaders are going to see this strategy fizzle.

Part of the problem was that when the military surge was announced, it became commonplace for officials to assert that political compromise, not military force, would determine the outcome of the war. This vacuous idea would startle George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh, to mention only a few unlikely bedfellows who forged success during an insurgency.

Buying time with American lives is not a military mission. No platoon commander tells his soldiers to go out and tread water so the politicians can talk. The goal of American soldiers is to identify and kill or capture the Shiite death squads and Sunni insurgents.

What is keeping them from doing so? The war in Iraq would be over in a week if the insurgents wore uniforms. Instead, they hide in plain sight, and Iraqi and American soldiers have no means of checking the true identity and history of anyone they stop.

This is inexcusable. In Vietnam, the mobility of the Vietcong guerrilla forces was eventually crippled by a laborious hamlet-level census completed by hand in 1968. Biometric tracking and databases have since made extraordinary advances, yet our vaunted technical experts have failed at this elementary task in Iraq....

More at the New York Times...

by SWJ Editors | Thu, 06/14/2007 - 6:38pm | 2 comments
Received from Carter Malkasian

This article originally appeared in Democracy, and is reposted here with their kind permission at the author's request.

Iraqization is a dead-end strategy. But there is still some hope of saving the country, and it lies in an unlikely place: local Sunni militias and police.

For more than two years, the heart of U.S. military strategy in Iraq has been "Iraqization," the creation of an effective Iraqi security force that can take the place of U.S. Marines and soldiers. Thereby, the United States can eventually withdraw without leaving behind a terrorist safe haven and fractured Iraq. A wide range of military officers, policymakers, and scholars argue that through re-invigorated American efforts at training, equipping, and advising the Iraqi Army, any shortcomings in the Iraqi security forces can be overcome. Even Democrats who oppose the surge strategy support Iraqization, contending that Iraqi security forces are perfectly capable of suppressing violence now but that only when the United States "stands down" will they truly "stand up."

Between February 2004 and February 2005, and later from February to August

2006, I served as an advisor to the I Marine Expeditionary Force (I MEF) in Al Anbar province. During that time I interviewed members of the Iraqi Army and police, held discussions with American advisers, and directly observed Iraqi Army and police operations. Al Anbar is overwhelmingly Sunni and infamously a center of insurgent activity. Therefore, it is critical to the success of the Iraqization strategy. Failure there means a U.S. withdrawal would leave hard-core insurgent groups, specifically Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), free to operate and possibly organize terrorist operations outside the province. Even if it is successful everywhere else in Iraq, Iraqization will have failed if it cannot work in Al Anbar...

by SWJ Editors | Wed, 06/13/2007 - 8:39pm | 2 comments

The folks at Defense and the National Interest

(DNI) have been kind enough to offer a block of seats to members of the

Small Wars Journal /

Small Wars Council community

of interest.  Space is very limited -- so it's first come first serve -- and

the price is right -- free.  For additional information to include the agenda

follow the continued reading link below...

For those that wish to attend please contact Mr. Bob Howard at

[email protected].

by John A. Nagl | Mon, 06/11/2007 - 9:24pm | 7 comments

In the linked paper I argue that, just as

the new realities of warfare demanded the creation of the Special Forces in the

1960's, winning the Long War will require that the Army develop a standing Advisor

Corps.  It has been informed by the experience of many advisors with service

in Iraq and Afghanistan, and may prove of some interest to the Small Wars Journal

/ Small Wars Council community of interest.

"Institutionalizing

Adaptation: It's Time for an Army Advisor Corps"

was published by the

Center for a New American Security.

The most important military component

of the Long War will not be the fighting we do ourselves, but how well we enable

and empower our allies to fight with us. After describing the many complicated,

interrelated, and simultaneous tasks that must be conducted to defeat an insurgency,

the new

Army / Marine Corps Counterinsurgency

Field Manual notes

"Key to all these tasks is developing an effective host-nation (HN) security

force. Indeed, it has been argued that foreign forces cannot defeat an insurgency;

the best they can hope for is to create the conditions that will enable local

forces to win for them...

by SWJ Editors | Mon, 06/11/2007 - 7:26pm | 0 comments

The Small Wars Council has begun a discussion of John Robb’s new book Brave New War at the Brave New War Roundtable thread.  The discussion is in the Members Only forum and can be accessed after a short, painless and free registration process.

Join in today and participate over the coming weeks in an in-depth discussion on Robb’s latest on the “next stage of terrorism and the end of globalization”.

by SWJ Editors | Fri, 06/08/2007 - 8:18pm | 0 comments

A quick look at several recent news articles that mention or quote members of the Small Wars Journal and Council community of interest and a boatload of thanks to fellow bloggers, reporters and columnists who have helped us along in our quest to facilitate and support the exchange of information among practitioners, thought leaders, and students of Small Wars, in order to advance

knowledge and capabilities in the field.

by Jim Guirard | Thu, 06/07/2007 - 11:24am | 9 comments

Diana West's

holier-than-thou attack on

Dr. David Kilcullen

of

Gen. David Petraeus' senior staff in Baghdad must be a delight to al Qaeda and

Hizballah propagandists and anti-American brainwashers worldwide.

In a June 1, 2007 Washington Times essay entitled

"Pay attention to jihad,"

she slams the Australian-born anti-Terrorism strategist for an assertion several

months ago that so-called "jihad" (holy war in the name of Allah, etc.) has assumed

the stature of heroic "adventure" in the minds, hearts and souls of many young Muslims.

She distorts Kilcullen's words into the preposterous

speculation that  he approves of this development and asks whether

if he had grown up in Hitler's Germany he "might have become a Nazi" -- when, in

fact, the man and his fellow counterinsurgency (COIN) experts are attempting to

discover an effective antidote for a highly seductive "Jihadi martyrdom" factor

which is providing al Qaeda-style Terrorism with an endless supply of enthusiastic

young suicide mass murderers.

by SWJ Editors | Wed, 06/06/2007 - 4:15am | 1 comment

Recruit more Iraqi Soldiers and increase their divisions from 11 to 20 is what one counterinsurgency expert said he would do if he was in the shoes of the Multinational Forces - Iraq commander.

Dr. David Kilcullen, an authority on counterinsurgency, was appointed to advise the MNF-Iraq commander, Gen. David Petraeus. Dr. Kilcullen visited Soldiers with the 10th Mountain Division's 2nd Brigade out of Fort Drum, N.Y., to take stock of the "Commando" brigade's progress June 2 and 3.

Dr. Kilcullen served 21 years in the Australian army and has led Timorese troops, was a special advisor for irregular warfare during the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review, and remains a reserve lieutenant colonel in the Australian army.

Col. Michael Kershaw, 2nd BCT commander, escorted Dr. Kilcullen around Patrol Base Dragon, the Yusufiyah Joint Security Station and the Mahmudiyah Iraqi Army Compound...

by Bing West | Tue, 06/05/2007 - 11:17pm | 0 comments

Originally aired on 1 June on The News Hour w/ Jim Lehrer.  

Iraq's Anbar Province Faces Political, Military Changes

Iraq's western Anbar Province is undergoing shifts in military and political power as Sunni Arab militants continue to battle with al-Qaida insurgents. A journalist and a former military official discuss the region's struggles.

Ray Suarez - "For an on-the-ground assessment of the situation in Iraq's largest province, we're joined by two men who visited there last month. David Wood is the national security correspondent for the Baltimore Sun, and former Marine Captain Bing West, he's now a correspondent for the Atlantic magazine and has written two books about the war."

Full transcript and audio available here at The News Hour's site. 

by SWJ Editors | Tue, 06/05/2007 - 5:32pm | 6 comments

Commander, United States Marine Corps

Forces, Central Command Reading List

Commander's Intent: The Global War on Terrorism

is a long war, and as such we need to continue our preparation to be engaged in

all aspects of this war. For our current fights the MARCENT Reading List provides

a collection of readings to be read dependent upon your grade and how long you have

before deploying. Whether part of a unit or an individual augment, my intent is

to prepare you for the operational, tactical, cultural and environmental factors

affecting your specific fight. This reading list is not all inclusive and your local

command may require you to accomplish other tasks in preparation for deployment

as well. All of these actions will ensure we send educated, well-trained and properly

prepared Marines into the fight. Turn-to, get it done, you and your Marines will

be better for your efforts.

LtGen James N. Mattis

Commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Central

Command

by SWJ Editors | Tue, 06/05/2007 - 4:43pm | 0 comments

Dr. Steven Metz's latest monograph, Rethinking Insurgency, has just been posted to the US Army Strategic Studies Institute's (SSI) web page.

The U.S. military and national security community lost interest in insurgency after the end of the Cold War when other defense issues such as multinational peacekeeping and transformation seemed more pressing. With the onset of the Global War on Terror in 2001 and the ensuing involvement of the U.S. military in counterinsurgency support in Iraq and Afghanistan, insurgency experienced renewed concern in both the defense and intelligence communities. The author argues that while exceptionally important, this relearning process focused on Cold War era nationalistic insurgencies rather than the complex conflicts which characterized the post-Cold War security environment. To be successful at counterinsurgency, he contends, the U.S. military and defense community must rethink insurgency, which has profound implications for American strategy and military doctrine.