Small Wars Journal

Blog Posts

SWJ Blog is a multi-author blog publishing news and commentary on the various goings on across the broad community of practice.  We gladly accept guest posts from serious voices in the community.

by SWJ Editors | Sun, 05/03/2009 - 5:25am | 0 comments
Moment of Truth in Pakistan - David Ignatius, Washington Post opinion.

President Obama convened a crisis meeting at the White House last Monday to hear a report from Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had just returned from Pakistan. Mullen described the worrying situation there, with Taliban insurgents moving closer to the capital, Islamabad.

"It had gotten significantly worse than I expected as the Swat deal unraveled," Mullen explained in an interview. He was referring to a truce brokered in February in the Swat Valley, about 100 miles north of Islamabad. The Pakistani military had expected that the cease-fire would subdue Taliban fighters in Swat. Instead, the Muslim militants surged south into the district of Buner, on the doorstep of the capital.

Listening to Mullen's report at the White House were two senior officials - Defense Secretary Bob Gates and special envoy Richard Holbrooke - who were serving in government back in 1979, when a Muslim insurgency toppled the Iranian government, with harmful consequences that persist to this day. The two policy veterans "made the argument that it's worth studying the Iran model," recalls a senior official who took part in the White House meeting...

More at The Washington Post.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 05/02/2009 - 12:43pm | 0 comments
US General Says Pakistan Could be Just Two Weeks from Collapse - Isambard Wilkinson, Daily Telegraph.

There may be just two weeks left to prevent the Taliban from overthrowing Pakistan's government, Gen David Petraeus, the commander of American forces in the region, has told officials.

American officials have watched with growing anxiety as Taliban fighters have strengthened their grip on north-western Pakistan.

Militants advanced to within 60 miles of Islamabad, the capital, last month and were pushed back only when the US put pressure on Pakistan to launch a counter-offensive.

Gen Petraeus, the head of Central Command, which covers all US forces in the Middle East and south Asia, is reported to have said that the Pakistanis have run out of excuses" and now accept that tough action has to be taken to guarantee the government's survival...

More at The Daily Telegraph.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 05/02/2009 - 4:15am | 0 comments
Ex-Spy Sits Down With Islamists and the West - Robert F. Worth, New York Times.

Talking to Islamists is the new order of the day in Washington and London. The Obama administration wants a dialogue with Iran, and the British Foreign Office has decided to reopen diplomatic contacts with Hezbollah, the Shiite militant group based here.

But for several years, small groups of Western diplomats have made quiet trips to Beirut for confidential sessions with members of Hamas, Hezbollah and other Islamist groups they did not want to be seen talking to. In hotel conference rooms, they would warily shake hands, then spend hours listening and hashing out accusations of terrorism on one side and imperial arrogance on the other.

The organizer of these back-door encounters is Alastair Crooke, a quiet, sandy-haired man of 59 who spent three decades working for MI6, the British secret intelligence service. He now runs an organization here called Conflicts Forum, with an unusual board of advisers that includes former spies, diplomats and peace activists...

More at The New York Times.

by SWJ Editors | Fri, 05/01/2009 - 4:24pm | 2 comments
This week's SWJ contribution to Foreign Policy - This Week at War by Robert Haddick - is now posted. Topics include - Do Pakistan's leaders lack an instinct for survival? - Will the United States ever fix its combat advisor problems?
by SWJ Editors | Fri, 05/01/2009 - 3:40am | 0 comments
Training Afghans as Bullets Fly: A Young Marine's Dream Job - C. J. Chivers, New York Times

Three stone houses and a cluster of sandbagged bunkers cling to a slope above the Korangal Valley, forming an oval perimeter roughly 75 yards long. The oval is reinforced with timber and ringed with concertina wire.

An Afghan flag flutters atop a tower where Afghan soldiers look out, ducking when rifle shots snap by.

This is Firebase Vimoto, named for Pfc. Timothy R. Vimoto, an American soldier killed in the valley two years ago. If all goes according to the Pentagon's plan, this tiny perimeter - home to an Afghan platoon and two Marine Corps infantrymen - contains the future of Afghanistan. The Obama administration hopes that eventually the Afghan soldiers within will become self-sufficient, allowing the fight against the Taliban to be shifted to local hands...

More at The New York Times.

by SWJ Editors | Thu, 04/30/2009 - 4:45pm | 0 comments
"The American Military Advisor" - Michael J. Metrinko, Middle East Quarterly

In the post-9/11 world, an advisory position at the political and strategic level in the Islamic world can have great and immediate consequence for US interests, and can make the American advisor a prime figure in the decision-making process of foreign leaders. The advisor is as likely to be dealing with a civilian counterpart as he is with a foreign military officer, and the range of duties will go far beyond mere military tasks. The position has become a critical one in today's world where stability, peacekeeping, and obtaining civil support are considered equally important to kinetic offensive and defensive operations, and where "nation-building" has become a de facto and integral part of the military mission.

The American advisor must take care not to let himself be regarded as just another person who has come to pass out gifts in order to curry favor. He must not be regarded as simply a source of material assistance, supplies, high tech presents, and trips abroad under the rubric of training. In resource-strapped Afghanistan, for example, local and even senior officials became accustomed to requesting telephones, office furniture, office supplies, security accessories, equipment of all sorts, vehicles, and a wide variety of other items from Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) commanders, American officials, and other foreign visitors and donors. On many occasions, the Afghans would request the same items from multiple sources. The advisor must look at himself through local eyes and the local culture. If the American officer's "can do" attitude is too highly developed, he may just seem ill-mannered and abrasive to the official and his staff, who often operate at a different tempo than that in US military circles. If he appears to be too young and lacking in authority, the American may be regarded simply as a decorative foreign staff aide who tags along to add luster to the official's entourage...

More at Middle East Quarterly.

by SWJ Editors | Thu, 04/30/2009 - 6:24am | 6 comments
US Takes Dutch Military as Role Model in Afghan Operation - Jay Solomon, Wall Street Journal

The Obama administration, which wants to send hundreds of additional civilian personnel into Afghanistan, is looking at the Dutch military's operations there for lessons on how to combat the Taliban.

The civilian deployment is part of a US focus on economic development meant to weaken support for the Taliban and dry up finances it derives from the opium trade. The civilians will complement the deployment in the coming months of 21,000 new troops, many of whom will be posted to southern provinces where the Taliban are thriving.

The Obama administration, however, is having trouble finding civilian experts at the State Department to send to Afghanistan. Pentagon officials said they may need military reservists to fill any shortfall in the 500 to 600 civilians Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is seeking for Afghanistan.

The Netherlands, with nearly 2,000 personnel in southern Uruzgan province, has better integrated the efforts of its military and civilian personnel than the US, senior US officials say...

More at The Wall Street Journal.

by SWJ Editors | Thu, 04/30/2009 - 5:54am | 0 comments
National Security Facilitator - David Ignatius, Washington Post opinion.

One of the puzzles of the Obama administration's first few months was how the National Security Council would work under Gen. James Jones. He had the tricky challenge of managing an all-star "team of rivals" and working with a young president who was just 6 when Jones went off to Vietnam in 1967 as a Marine Corps second lieutenant.

So far, the foreign policy process has generally been smooth, and one reason is that Jones has played a lower-profile role than some of his predecessors as national security adviser. That collegial style has helped avoid fireworks, but some analysts have wondered about Jones's own strategic views. Jones explained his outlook in an interview this week at the White House...

More at The Washington Post.

by SWJ Editors | Wed, 04/29/2009 - 8:51pm | 0 comments
Gates's Next Lever to Reshape the Pentagon: QDR - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor

Defense Secretary Robert Gates's bid to remake the Pentagon enters a new and crucial phase this week as the Defense Department begins a year-long review of its own strategy that will inform how it should spend billions of dollars and what its priorities should be.

The result is the Quadrennial Defense Review, and in addition to the Pentagon budget, the QDR is one of the most powerful tools at Secretary Gates's disposal to try to put the military on a new course. He has argued the Pentagon must get its head in the current fights in Iraq and Afghanistan instead of gazing at the strategic horizon -- preparing for hypothetical threats, such as the one posed by China.

The QDR, released every four years, is designed to consider all scenarios. According to a Pentagon internal document, this year's QDR will assess the risks for scenarios including the possibility of militants in Pakistan getting control of its nuclear weapons and a potential conflict between China and Taiwan. Ultimately, the review must answer the question of whether the US should worry about conventional threats from established countries or more "asymmetric" threats emanating from unstable countries such as Somalia...

More at The Christian Science Monitor.

by SWJ Editors | Wed, 04/29/2009 - 6:34pm | 0 comments
MEDIA ADVISORY

April 29, 2009

2009 Joint Warfighting Conference Addresses Key Themes of Building a Balanced Joint Force

Norfolk, Va. -- U. S. Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) will address the theme of Building a Balanced Joint Force: How Best to Meet the Demands of the Future Security Environment," during the 2009 Joint Warfighting Conference from May 12-14, at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, Virginia Beach, Va.

USJFCOM Commander Marine Gen. James N. Mattis will deliver opening remarks, and USJFCOM Deputy Commander Vice Adm. Robert S. Bob" Harward will participate on a panel Tuesday, May 12, to provide insights about hybrid warfare and its impacts on the future of joint warfare.

The conference also will focus on two recently released military documents -- the Joint Operating Environment (JOE) and the Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO).

The JOE lays out the problem statement and sets demand signals for future challenges, and the CCJO, signed by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, articulates his vision for how the future Joint Force will operate to address the challenges and meet the demands of future operating environments.

For current conference information and to register for the Joint Warfighting Conference, go to our registration site. Registration is free and open to the public.

During the conference, senior leaders from the Joint Warfighting Center, the Joint Center for Operational Analysis, Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Directorate as well as many others will be available to discuss individual programs and subjects of interest.

For those who will not be in attendance USJFCOM will provide "liveblogs" on both the command's website and USJFCOM's Twitter channel.

Interested media should contact Kathleen Jabs at the USJFCOM Public Affairs Media Section (757) 836-6553 or via e-mail and LCDR Rob Lyon, USJFCOM Media Operations Officer, at (757) 836-6559 or via e-mail.

by Dave Dilegge | Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:09pm | 0 comments
Been on two road trips and missed getting an early jump on Dave Kilcullen's testimony before the House Armed Services Committee concerning the situation in Pakistan. They dragged Dave out of our wargame last week to testify and I saw him off as he headed from our pristine suburban Maryland locale to the Hill -- but such is life - and our loss was a gain for Congressional SA on a worsening problem.

Anyway, kudos to Ex (also at the wargame) at Abu Muqawama for the link and for a bulletized summary of the "lowlights of the Pakistani Army's recent history". I have to agree - Studying the past few years, one could arrive at the conclusion that Pakistan's army is epically incompetent. One could similarly arrive at the conclusion that Pakistan's army is competent -- but fighting for the other side. Either way -- not much to cheer about.

Here is Dave's "bottom line" from his testimony:

The United States Government has spent $10 billion dollars supporting Pakistan since 9/11, and in that time we have seen a dramatically worsening situation across the whole country. More of the same will not help, and indeed may make the situation worse. I fully support the benchmarks in the bill and would like to see an even greater emphasis on rule of law, policing and civilian administration, with even greater conditionality and stringency placed on continued assistance to the Pakistani military, unless and until it demonstrates a genuine commitment to cease supporting the enemy and begin following the direction of its own elected civilian government.

Rather than continuing to pretend that Pakistan is a weak but —ally against extremism, we need to recognize that while some elements in Pakistan -- some elected civilian political leaders, the majority of the Pakistani people, many tribal and community leaders and some appointed administrative officials -- are genuinely committed to the fight against extremism, substantial parts of the Pakistani security establishment are complicit with the enemy, whether through incompetence, intimidation or ill intent. Our approach in assisting Pakistan should be to strengthen our friends and limit the power of our enemies, while helping Pakistan stabilize itself and govern its people responsibly and humanely. Increasing assistance to the police -- making the police, in effect, the premier counterinsurgency force -- while channeling all military support through civilian authorities and ensuring greater accountability and conditionality on military assistance, is the correct approach. We are way past prevention in 2009, and need to focus on stopping the rot and stabilizing the situation in 2009-2010, then rolling back extremism and militancy thereafter.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 04/25/2009 - 7:38am | 0 comments
Petraeus Calls On Pakistan To Redirect Military Focus - Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post. Gen. David H. Petraeus warned yesterday that al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists in Pakistan are posing "an ever more serious threat to Pakistan's very existence," and he said that Pakistan's leaders must act to counter the challenge with a well-trained military counterinsurgency force.

Some Taliban Retreat as Pakistan Troops Advance - Zahid Hussain and Matthew Rosenberg, Wall Street Journal. Pakistan's military chief dispatched army troops to the Buner district seized by the Taliban and gave the insurgents 24 hours to pull out, warning they would not be allowed to "impose their way of life" on the nation. Some Taliban were seen withdrawing Friday, piling into pickup trucks and minibuses with their assault weapons and rocket-propelled grenades in video broadcast by Pakistani news stations.

Taliban Shift Forces, but Hold Pakistan Valley - Carlotta Gall and Dexter Filkens, New York Times. The chief of Pakistan's Army, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, on Friday defended his army's performance and said it was committed to fighting militancy, in the face of growing criticism from American officials and Pakistani politicians that the military has failed to halt the Taliban insurgency as it creeps toward Islamabad, the capital.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 04/25/2009 - 7:33am | 0 comments
Storm of Violence in Iraq Strains Its Security Forces - Steven Lee Meyers and Sam Dagher, New York Times. A deadly outburst of violence appears to be overwhelming Iraq's police and military forces as American troops hand over greater control of cities across the country to them. On Friday, twin suicide bombings killed at least 60 people outside Baghdad's most revered Shiite shrine, pushing the death toll in one 24-hour period to nearly 150.

Bombers Strike Outside Baghdad Mosque - Charles Levinson, Wall Street Journal. A wave of attacks targeting Shiites in Iraq continued Friday as two suicide bombings struck outside the holiest Shiite mosque in Baghdad. The bombings killed at least 71 people according to reports Saturday. The attacks came a day after three bombings -- one in Baghdad and two in Diyala province -- left about 80 people dead and capped one of the bloodiest 24-hour periods in more than a year. Since Thursday afternoon, at least 140 people have died and hundreds more have been wounded in five attacks, all but one targeting Shiite holy sites, pilgrims, or predominantly Shiite neighborhoods.

Secretary of State Makes Surprise Visit to Iraq - Mary Beth Sheridan, Washington Post. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton flew to Iraq on Saturday, stressing the Obama administration's commitment to the country as a series of horrific suicide bombings fanned fears about its precarious stability.

Clinton, in Iraq, Blames 'Rejectionists' for Violence - Mark Landler, New York Times. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrived here Saturday morning for a one-day visit, delivering an American show of support for Iraq as it battles a sudden eruption of violence, in the wake of suicide bombings that killed at least 140 people and wounded several hundred more on Thursday and Friday.

In Iraq, Clinton Says Country on Right Track - Matthew Lee, Associated Press. US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says this week's deadly suicide bombings in Iraq are a sign that extremists are afraid the Iraqi government is succeeding.

Could Iraq Violence Affect US Withdrawal Plan? - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor. The wave of violence in recent weeks, coming as US troops have begun preparing for withdrawal, threatens to bring Iraq back to the front burner, after months of increased security coupled with Obama's focus on Afghanistan had pushed it back. Gen. David Petraeus, formerly the top US commander in Iraq and who now oversees both the wars there and in Afghanistan, warned lawmakers Friday that despite "substantial progress" in Iraq there remain lingering concerns. Al Qaeda in Iraq, as well as other groups, continue to pose a threat, he said.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 04/25/2009 - 7:28am | 1 comment
Three views concerning the use of private military companies by the US Government at The American Interest.

The Mercenary Debate by Deborah Avant. Private security contracting undermines democratic control of US foreign policy.

The Mercenary Debate by Max Boot. Mercenaries are inevitable and, if employed wisely, they can be effective adjuncts of US policy.

The Mercenary Debate by Jí¶rg Friedrichs and Cornelius Friesendorf. Privatized security cripples statebuilding; Iraq is a case in point.

by SWJ Editors | Sat, 04/25/2009 - 6:41am | 6 comments

Local Wars - Janine di Giovanni, New York Times Book Review

The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One by Dr. David Kilcullen

David Kilcullen is a former officer in the Australian Army, a strategist and a scholar. He is also an expert on counterinsurgency, or how to combat a rebellion, and one of the few brave souls who had the ear of people in the Bush White House and advised against the invasion of Iraq...

In "The Accidental Guerrilla," Kilcullen draws on his vast experience not only as a dedicated field researcher, but also as a soldier — he commanded an infantry company in counterinsurgency operations in East Timor in 1999. The most extensive sections of his book concentrate, naturally, on Iraq and Afghanistan (which he still sees as "winnable" with a long-term commitment), but his analysis leads him as well to smaller movements in such places as Chechnya, Thailand, Indonesia and the Horn of Africa...

Kilcullen skillfully interprets the future of counterinsurgency, the proper use of military force and what we must learn from our losses and mistakes...

The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One by Dr. David Kilcullen

by SWJ Editors | Fri, 04/24/2009 - 11:41pm | 0 comments
Below is a copy of this 1971 memo from General Volney F. Warner (then the Executive Officer and Senior Aide to the Army Chief of Staff) to General William C. Westmoreland (then the Army Chief of Staff). This memo concerns issues associated with ground force military assistance.

16 January 1971

Department of the Army

Office of the Chief of Staff

Washington

General Westmoreland,

The summarizes my paper on using foreign aide (sic) and military assistance as leverage to improve GVN performance which you saw in another form several years ago. It might be useful background material for your session with the East Asian Bureau tomorrow.

It's interesting to note that, with the exception of their leader Amb Sullivan, the SEA group at State has always opposed the use of any form of advisors in Vietnam or any other developing country. They are convinced that we "made a big mistake" in Vietnam when we brought advisors into the country; they are unable to see that if we "made a big mistake" it was when we let equipment, not people in, for it soon became obvious that if equipment goes, advisors must go with it if there is to be any hope whatever of its effective employment. That's a lesson the Russians learned years ago, but unfortunately everyone in the US Government was not as perceptive.

This, of course, ties in with the PACOM cable I flagged separately which is predicated on the premise that the Nixon Doctrine permits assistance only in the form of material and prohibits advisors in any form. This is a very disturbing element, not only because it leaves the Army completely out in the cold while acknowledging possible need for air and sea power (alone, without land-power" "if our vital interests are threatened." But because it simply will not work, as we proved in Vietnam and are proving again in Cambodia, which may yet prove a good test case of the futility of providing equipment without advisors to insure its good use.

You might like to try to make some these points tomorrow.

V.F. Warner

by SWJ Editors | Fri, 04/24/2009 - 10:27pm | 1 comment
SWJ's 14th weekly contribution to Foreign Policy - This Week at War by Robert Haddick - is now posted. Topics include attacks begin on the Afghan war "consensus" and do Defense and State need a marriage counselor?
by SWJ Editors | Thu, 04/23/2009 - 7:57am | 0 comments
Petraeus: What I Learned in Iraq, and How it Applies to Afghanistan - Christa Case Bryant and Carol Huang, Christian Science Monitor

As the US shifts focus from Iraq to Afghanistan, much attention has been given to how counterinsurgency strategies honed against Al Qaeda in Iraq may be applied to a resurgent Taliban.

If one man has the answer, it just might be Gen. David Petraeus.

Credited with turning around a war in Iraq that many considered hopeless, the four-star general has since become CENTCOM commander -- putting Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran under his aegis as well. In a speech Tuesday at Harvard University, he laid out the elements that helped reduce violence in Iraq to its lowest levels since 2003. Many aspects of those counterinsurgency efforts, he said, can be successfully applied in Afghanistan -- if they are applied in "culturally appropriate" ways...

More at The Christian Science Monitor.

Reservists Might Be Used in Afghanistan To Fill Civilian Jobs - Karen DeYoung, Washington Post

Military reservists may be asked to volunteer to fill many of the hundreds of additional U.S. civilian positions in Afghanistan called for in the Obama administration's strategy for that nation and neighboring Pakistan, officials said yesterday.

Although the State Department is still recruiting agronomists, engineers, accountants and other experts for Afghanistan, "pressure coming from the president for action is making us consider that some of the people might come from the reserves," one senior administration official said.

In announcing his plan last month, Obama called for a "dramatic" increase in civilian aid and development workers, and the goal is to send several hundred by the end of this fiscal year...

More at The Washington Post.

US Faces Rising Violence in Southern Afghanistan - Yochi Dreazen, Wall Street Journal

The shape of the Afghan conflict is shifting, as US reinforcements have brought hints of progress along the porous eastern border with Pakistan, while security conditions in southern Afghanistan continue to deteriorate, according to US officials.

Senior American commanders say they believe the war may be won or lost in southern Afghanistan, a Taliban stronghold and one of the world's largest opium-producing regions, where an estimated 80% of Afghanistan's insurgent violence occurs. A shortage of US forces has allowed the Taliban to create safe havens in the south.

"We're at a stalemate" in the south, said US Maj. Gen. Michael Tucker, deputy chief of staff for operations for the American-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization force in Afghanistan. He didn't provide figures on worsening violence...

More at The Wall Street Journal.

Taliban Seize Vital Pakistan Area Closer to the Capital - Jane Perlez, New York Times

Pushing deeper into Pakistan, Taliban militants have established effective control of a strategically important district just 70 miles from the capital, Islamabad, officials and residents said Wednesday.

The fall of the district, Buner, did not mean that the Taliban could imminently threaten Islamabad. But it was another indication of the gathering strength of the insurgency and it raised new alarm about the ability of the government to fend off an unrelenting Taliban advance toward the heart of Pakistan.

Buner, home to about one million people, is a gateway to a major Pakistani city, Mardan, the second largest in North-West Frontier Province, after Peshawar...

More at The New York Times.

by SWJ Editors | Tue, 04/21/2009 - 12:43pm | 3 comments
Tom Ricks, the Washington Post's special military correspondent, wrote a controversial article in Sunday's Post proposing that the three military academies -- West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy -- be closed. Ricks' suggestion raises the age-old question: Can leadership really be taught? This question is explored in On Leadership, The Washington Post's special section on leadership, vision and motivation.

Want to trim the federal budget and improve the military at the same time? Shut down West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy, and use some of the savings to expand ROTC scholarships.

After covering the U.S. military for nearly two decades, I've concluded that graduates of the service academies don't stand out compared to other officers. Yet producing them is more than twice as expensive as taking in graduates of civilian schools ($300,000 per West Point product vs. $130,000 for ROTC student). On top of the economic advantage, I've been told by some commanders that they prefer officers who come out of ROTC programs, because they tend to be better educated and less cynical about the military...

On Leadership panelists weight in:

Ed Ruggero, author of a definitive book on the training of leaders at West Point, says Ricks missed the mark.

A retired Army General says perhaps leadership can't be taught, but there is something to be said about West Point, which is the only institution of higher education devoted exclusively to creating leaders of character for our Army and the nation.

A retired Navy Captain and former Annapolis professor asks why the question needs to be asked in the first place.

by SWJ Editors | Mon, 04/20/2009 - 10:41pm | 0 comments
Leadership, Petraeus Style - Paula D. Broadwell, Boston Globe

With a faltering economy, soaring unemployment, and overseas military commitments consuming more each day than the gross domestic product of many small nations, the United States urgently needs adaptive and transformational leaders. In paying tribute to Harvard veterans at a Kennedy School Forum tonight, General David H. Petraeus will underline the importance of adaptive leaders in today's complex national security environment.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has called Petraeus the "preeminent soldier, scholar, and statesman" of his generation - roles that he transitions among as the commander of US Central Command.

Is his leadership unique? And if so, in what way? In more than 100 hours of interviews with Petraeus, his mentors, peers, and subordinates, I have elicited numerous perspectives on his style of leadership and approach to juggling the responsibilities of "soldier, scholar, and statesman." A common theme is that Petraeus models the very principles of adaptive leadership that he advocates...

More at The Boston Globe.

by SWJ Editors | Mon, 04/20/2009 - 8:37pm | 1 comment
The Challenge of Retaining Majors in Our Army - Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV (aka Frontier 6) at the US Army Combined Arms Center Blog.

A recent article in the Armed Forces Journal by MAJ Myles Caggins, III, discussed possible incentive plans to retain U.S. Army majors. Caggins asserts that qualified enlisted recruits receive up to $40,000; Army captains $35,000; Navy officers $121,000; and a typical Army major -- nothing. He offers some creative proposals he believes would help retain more of our field grade officers -- you all.

The Global War on Terror has tested our Army's personnel management systems. The shortage of majors has many causes, not the least of which is junior officer retention rates, the creation of modular brigades, and growth of our Army.

Consider, for example, the "cohort" of Army officers who were commissioned in 1998. They originally numbered 4,155. Those the Army retained have now served 10 years of active duty. Although the Army still requires about 2,200 of these officers, it has only kept about 1,800. Additionally, the ranks of captain through lieutenant colonel are only manned at 80 percent strength.

The Army cannot accept risk in its officer corps, and the consequences of how we act now will have generational impacts. We're soliciting your help. Please provide feedback on how you think we can retain quality field grade officers. Specifically, what motivates you and your peers to continue to serve? Do you think there should be increased incentives? Should there be changes in assignments, policies or education? What would you recommend?

Would encourage you to read MAJ Caggins' article and comment on the pros/cons of his argument. We need to get this right and we need your help.

Thank you for helping shape the public debate on this important subject. We will highlight your feedback with leaders at the highest level in our Army as they look for creative solutions to today's complex personnel management environment. Nothing would send a more powerful message than to have the entire CGSC class sound off and provide input. We look forward to your thoughts and recommendation.

-----

Be sure to check out this post's comments at the CAC Blog.

by SWJ Editors | Mon, 04/20/2009 - 5:27am | 0 comments
Karzai Agrees with US Strategy, But Says No al-Qaida Bases in Afghanistan - Voice of America. Afghan President Hamid Karzai says he agrees with almost all elements of US President Barack Obama's strategy for Afghanistan, but the Afghan leader does not believe al-Qaida has a presence in his country. Mr. Karzai made the comments in an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN, on Fareed Zakaria's GPS program. Mr. Obama's plan involves deploying thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan, and it makes defeating al-Qaida and other terrorist groups the top priority.

Extremist Tide Rises in Pakistan - Pamela Constable, Washington Post. A potentially troubling era dawned Sunday in Pakistan's Swat Valley, where a top Islamist militant leader, emboldened by a peace agreement with the federal government, laid out an ambitious plan to bring a "complete Islamic system" to the surrounding northwest region and the entire country.

A Blast, an Ambush and a Sprint Out of a Taliban Kill Zone - C. J. Chivers, New York Times. The American patrol had left Korangal Outpost, the base for Company B of the First Battalion, 26th Infantry, on Wednesday, roughly an hour before the ambush. Its mission had been to enter the village of Laneyal and meet with local elders.

Missiles Demolish Taliban Compound - Nahal Toosi, Associated Press. Suspected US missiles leveled a Taliban compound in northwest Pakistan on Sunday, officials said, killing three people despite militants' threats of a wave of suicide bombings if the strikes don't end. Meanwhile, a hard-line cleric who mediated a deal that imposes Islamic law in a northwest valley in exchange for peace with the Taliban warned that the Pakistani government must enforce the law, not simply make announcements about it.

Karzai Asks NATO to Explain Deaths - Jason Straziuso, Associated Press. The top US general in Afghanistan said Sunday there wasn't enough money in the world to replace the loss of an Afghan civilian, in comments that followed repeated calls by Afghan President Hamid Karzai for explanations of civilian deaths.

Raids Crack Afghan Opium Trade - Sara Carter, Washington Times. US-Afghan operations have led to the arrests of seven of Afghanistan's most wanted drug lords and revealed the growing involvement of the Taliban in turning opium into heroin and morphine, Pentagon and Drug Enforcement Administration officials said.

Stability in Afghanistan Must Be No. 1 Goal - Trudy Rubin, Philadelphia Inquirer opinion. Of all the pressing foreign-policy items on President Obama's plate, bar none, AfPak is the most troubling. The nightmare scenario used by the Bush administration to justify the Iraq war - the possibility that terrorists might obtain nukes - was applied to the wrong country. Iraq had no nukes and no al-Qaeda before we invaded, but Pakistan has both.

Maliki Critic Wins Iraqi Speaker Role - Charles Levinson, Wall Street Journal. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's political opponents scored a victory Sunday, electing a critic of Mr. Maliki's as speaker of parliament. Mr. Maliki emerged from local elections earlier this year claiming a popular mandate and broad support among Iraqis of different sects. But the election of Eyad al-Samarrai, head of the Sunni Iraqi Islamic Party, could provide a platform in parliament for Maliki critics to challenge the prime minister.

Iraq's Wobbles - Washington Post editorial. It's been only seven weeks since President Obama outlined a strategy for Iraq aimed at withdrawing most U.S. troops by the end of next summer. But already there is cause for concern. During the past month security around the country has been slipping: At least 37 people have been killed in four major attacks on security forces in the past week alone, and there have been multiple car bombings in Baghdad and other cities. Those strikes have been claimed by al-Qaeda, which appears to be attempting a comeback. But there have also been new bursts of sectarian violence among Sunni and Shiite extremists.

NATO Stops Attack by Somali Pirates - Matthew Clark, Christian Science Monitor. A Canadian warship and NATO helicopters foiled a pirate attack on a Norwegian tanker on Sunday, says the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. American forces also pursued pirates who fired rocket-propelled grenades at the 80,000-tonne MV Front Ardenne, reports BBC.

US Projects Openness at Summit - Laura Meckler, Wall Street Journal. President Barack Obama came to the Summit of the Americas determined to reach out to his Latin American neighbors, and he departed with two of the most antagonistic having reached back.

Obama Defends Greeting Hugo Chavez - Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times. Rebuffing criticism of the warm greetings he exchanged with Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez, President Obama said Sunday that the United States, with its overwhelming military superiority and need to improve its global image, could afford to extend such diplomatic "courtesy."

Police Swoop on Leader of Mexican Drug Cartel La Familia - Daily Telegraph. Rafael Cedeno Gonzalez, the alleged cartel head in Lazaro Cardenas, Michoacan - where the gang is largely based - and in the southwest state of Guerrero, was arrested on Saturday, federal police chief Rodrigo Esparza said. Gonzalez is presumed to report directly to the main "La Familia" head Nazario Moreno Gonzalez, who is one of the most wanted drug lords in Mexico; the government has offered 30 million pesos bounty for his capture.

Support Mexico - Rich Lowry, National Review opinion. President Barack Obama went to Mexico and, unlike many of his presidential predecessors, didn't stay in a remote resort, but in the midst of Mexico City, the sprawling metropolis of 20 million. The visit - Obama's first stop in Latin America - and the locale - the capital where an American president hadn't visited in 12 years - sent the signal that the United States is committed to a country that is a punching bag in American domestic politics, but an indispensable ally in a region buffeted by revolutionary left-wing politics.

US, Netherlands to Boycott UN Racism Conference - Associated Press. The Obama administration will boycott "with regret" a UN conference on racism next week over objectionable language in the meeting's final document that could single out Israel for criticism and restrict free speech, the State Department said Saturday.

Britain Should Boycott This UN Charade - Rosemary Righter, The Times opinion. A UN conference "against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance" ought to be unexceptionable. No one can contend that prejudice and racial hatred are yesterday's problems. Yet the persistence of intolerance is precisely what makes the decision by America, Canada, Australia, Italy, the Netherlands and Israel to boycott the conference, which opens today in Geneva, a brave defence of principle; just as it makes Britain's resigned participation a supine exercise in hypocrisy.

Inter-Korean Talks to Start Tuesday - Kurt Achin, Voice of America. North and South Korea are planning to hold their first inter-governmental talks since the South's conservative president assumed office last year. The rare meeting comes as North Korea sharpens its menacing rhetoric and detains a South Korean businessman. North Korean officials have mostly refused to sit across a table from what they call South Korean "traitors" for more than a year. Now, says South Korean Unification Ministry Spokeswoman Lee Jong-joo, the South has accepted an offer from Pyongyang to talk.

Spinning a UN Failure - Wall Street Journal editorial. It's strange enough that the Obama Administration is hyping last week's toothless statement by the United Nations Security Council condemning North Korea's recent rocket launch. Even more amazing, it says the UN move is "legally binding" on member states.

Obama Adviser Defends Release of Secret Memo - Kara Rowland, Washington Times. Top White House officials denied Sunday that President Obama's release of top-secret memos hurt national security by giving terrorists details of US interrogation techniques - as charged by the former head of the CIA and four of his predecessors - saying the information was already public.

DHS Wants to Know What You're Thinking - Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review opinion. For eight years, we've been treated to hysterical rhetoric from Democrats, including Barack Obama, about the scourge of "domestic spying." Now that the Obama administration is openly calling for domestic spying - the real thing, not the smear used against President Bush - they're suddenly silent. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in coordination with the FBI, has issued an intelligence assessment on what it calls "Rightwing Extremism." It is appalling. The nakedly political document announces itself as a "federal effort to influence domestic public opinion." It proceeds, in what it acknowledges is the absence of any "specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence," to speculate that "rightwing" political views might "drive" such violence - violence, it further surmises, that might be abetted by military veterans returning home after putting their lives on the line in Iraq and Afghanistan. And for good measure, in violation of both FBI guidelines and congressional statutes, the Obama administration promises scrutiny of ordinary Americans' political views, speech, and assembly.

(Right) Winging It at the DHS - Jonah Goldberg, National Review opinion. The Extremism and Radicalization Branch of the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division of the Department of Homeland Security issued a report last week. It's called "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." The problem with it is that it makes little effort to document or demonstrate its contention that "extremist" groups are resurgent, that they are right-wing, or that they may be formed from the ranks of "disgruntled military veterans." Worse, it's very sloppy about what qualifies someone as "extremist" in the first place. Basically, it's fancy bureaucratese for: We're guessing bad people will do bad things because the economy is bad and the president is black. But we have no real evidence.

ETA Military Chief Jurdan Martitegi Arrested in France - Graham Keeley, The Times. The military leader of ETA, the Basque separatist organisation, has been arrested - delivering another serious blow to a group that has been weakened by a series of recent setbacks.

'Thousands Flee' Sri Lanka Combat - BBC News. About 5,000 Sri Lankans have escaped from a Tamil Tiger-held area in the north of the country, the army says. The military said the people fled after the army broke through a fortification which had been blocking its advance into the Tigers' last stronghold.

by SWJ Editors | Sun, 04/19/2009 - 3:49pm | 0 comments
Interviews with Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai and Ambassador Richard Holbrooke - Real Clear Politics

Holbrooke: This is a work in progress, quite frankly, Fareed.

The Obama administration came into office only nine weeks ago, 10 weeks ago, without having inherited a clear policy on this from the previous administration. We are examining it at every level. It is an extremely important and interesting issue.

But at this point -- and I'm being very honest with you, Fareed -- we don't really know how this program or project might work.

But the importance of reaching out and making clear to those people fighting with the Taliban, who are not committed to its values, but are there because they misunderstand why NATO is present, that's a very important thing.

More at Real Clear Politics.

by SWJ Editors | Sun, 04/19/2009 - 3:44pm | 0 comments
Apple's New Weapon - Benjamin Sutherland, Newsweek

Tying the hands of a person who is speaking, the Arab proverb goes, is akin to "tying his tongue." Western soldiers in Iraq know how important gestures can be when communicating with locals. To close, open and close a fist means "light," but just opening a fist means "bomb." One soldier recently home from Iraq once tried to order an Iraqi man to lie down. To get his point across, the soldier had to demonstrate by stretching out in the dirt. Translation software could help, but what's the best way to make it available in the field?

The U.S. military in the past would give a soldier an electronic handheld device, made at great expense specially for the battlefield, with the latest software. But translation is only one of many software applications soldiers now need. The future of "networked warfare" requires each soldier to be linked electronically to other troops as well as to weapons systems and intelligence sources. Making sense of the reams of data from satellites, drones and ground sensors cries out for a handheld device that is both versatile and easy to use. With their intuitive interfaces, Apple devices—the iPod Touch and, to a lesser extent, the iPhone—are becoming the handhelds of choice...

More at Newsweek.

by SWJ Editors | Sun, 04/19/2009 - 2:12pm | 0 comments
Gates Proposes Change in Strategy - Nancy A. Youssef and David Lightman, McClatchy News Service (Miami Herald)

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who often complains that the Pentagon isn't on a war footing even as it fights two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said he plans to start a new era with the new budget he'll present to Congress this week.

''I kept running into the fact that the Department of Defense as an institution -- which routinely complained that the rest of government wasn't at war -- was itself not on war footing, even as young Americans were fighting and dying every day,'' Gates said on a three-day tour of military installations last week, adding: ``These proposals, then, begin the effort to establish an institutional home in the Department of Defense for today's war fighter as well as tomorrow's.''

The question before Congress is whether his budget focuses too much on the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and not enough on potential threats from countries like China, Iran and North Korea.

The debate begins Wednesday at a Senate Armed Services subcommittee hearing on the readiness of U.S. ground forces...

More at The Miami Herald.